Archive for the 'Iran' Category

A Feeling I’m Being Had

A great satirical piece by Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams:

I was happy to hear that NYC didn’t allow Iranian President Ahmadinejad to place a wreath at the WTC site. And I was happy that Columbia University is rescinding the offer to let him speak. If you let a guy like that express his views, before long the entire world will want freedom of speech.

I hate Ahmadinejad for all the same reasons you do. For one thing, he said he wants to “wipe Israel off the map.” Scholars tell us the correct translation is more along the lines of wanting a change in Israel’s government toward something more democratic, with less gerrymandering. What an ass-muncher!

Ahmadinejad also called the holocaust a “myth.” Fuck him! A myth is something a society uses to frame their understanding of their world, and act accordingly. It’s not as if the world created a whole new country because of holocaust guilt and gives it a free pass no matter what it does. That’s Iranian crazy talk. Ahmadinejad can blow me.

Most insulting is the fact that “myth” implies the holocaust didn’t happen. Fuck him for saying that! He also says he won’t dispute the historical claims of European scientists. That is obviously the opposite of saying the holocaust didn’t happen, which I assume is his way of confusing me. God-damned fucker.

Furthermore, why does an Iranian guy give a speech in his own language except for using the English word “myth”? Aren’t there any Iranian words for saying a set of historical facts has achieved an unhealthy level of influence on a specific set of decisions in the present? He’s just being an asshole.

Ahmadinejad believes his role is to pave the way for the coming of the Twelfth Imam. That’s a primitive apocalyptic belief! I thank Jesus I do not live in a country led by a man who believes in that sort of bullshit. Imagine how dangerous that would be, especially if that man had the launch codes for nuclear weapons.

The worst of the worst is that Ahmadinejad’s country is helping the Iraqis kill American soldiers. If Iran ever invades Canada, I think we’d agree the best course of action for the United States is to be constructive and let things sort themselves out. Otherwise we’d be just as evil as the Iranians. Those fuckers.

Those Iranians need to learn from the American example. In this country, if the clear majority of the public opposes the continuation of a war, our leaders will tell us we’re terrorist-humping idiots and do whatever they damn well please. They might even increase our taxes to do it. That’s called leadership.

If Ahmadinejad thinks he can be our friend by honoring our heroes and opening a dialog, he underestimates our ability to misinterpret him. Fucking idiot. I hate him.

[hat tip: Peoples Geography]

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

The Guardian’s war on Iran

Following on from  Simon Tisdall’s stenograph earlier in the week, the Weekend Guardian continued its campaign against Iran with a new article by neocon hacks, Robert Tait. He starts with the trusted favourites of war pimps everywhere, human rights violations and political repression.

The bloodied face of a young woman – stripped of her Islamic head-covering after a “confrontation” with Iran’s morals police – provides a more graphic insight into the psyche of that country’s rulers than any macho boasts of nuclear feats or American accusations of meddling in Iraq.

The event was captured on camera in Tehran’s busy Hafte Tir Square last week and has since been circulated on Iranian websites and broadcast on the US state department-funded Voice of America’s Farsi language TV broadcasts.

It has become the most compelling image of the government’s so-called “morality” crackdown, in which thousands of young women – and many men – have been detained for wearing dress or hairstyles deemed insufficiently Islamic.

The crackdown has extended beyond the inappropriately dressed. Last weekend, police in arrested at 1,000 “thugs” – a description broadly covering criminals, thieves and general street urchins – in Tehran’s rougher southern neighbourhoods. The move prompted condemnation even within the regime after pictures circulated online showing some of the alleged miscreants being paraded in public with toilet-wash bowls around their neck and marks of severe beatings on their faces.

In recent days, the police’s attention has extended to drug users, of which Iran has several million. Some of the most serious addicts have been rounded up in a series of swoops. Police say they have been taken to rehabilitation centres, but critics suspect less humane treatment may have been meted out.

Given the ink is still drying on this year’s Amnesty International report which has just heavily criticised the US itself for human rights violations or the plight women and children in countries that the axis of feeble has liberated or even the over enthusiasm of  some Western police officers, Tait’s rant is nothing short of hypocrisy. He then looks at Iran’s economy:

At the same time, there has been panic on the Tehran stock exchange, after Mr Ahmadinejad ordered a reduction of interest rates to 12% despite surging inflation and contrary advice from economists. Experts say the move will trigger a banking crisis and hyperinflation. To cap it all, Ahmadinejad’s government will next month impose petrol rationing – an extraordinary move in a nation synonymous with oil wealth – to curb the crippling costs of providing subsidised fuel to motorists.

Iran’s economy does have problems but that is against a backdrop of imposed sanctions. Moreover, Tait should be well aware of the Iranian situation in which it is oil rich but refining capacity poor – due in part to US interference. Tait drones on.

These events have played out against a backdrop of arrests of a series of Iranian-American scholars supposedly suspected of fomenting a velvet revolution against the country’s Islamic power structure.

More remarkable than those was the detention this month of a former nuclear negotiator, Hossein Mousavian, an ex-ambassador to Germany and confidant of the former president, Hashemi Rafsanjani. Mousavian, who has since been bailed, was accused of spying. But well-informed Iranian emigres say his real crime was being caught on a bugged telephone advising an Iranian diplomat currently based in Germany against returning home to an increasingly unstable and uncertain situation.

It all points to a society – and a political system – turning in on itself. Iran is not nearly as unstable as, say, Zimbabwe, but the external pressures – in the form of UN sanctions and American hostility – are greater and the situation is becoming increasingly volatile.

Apparently, according to Robert Tait or whoever dictated this piece of hackery to him, Iran is on the verge of collapse.

With Iran this week defying yet another security council deadline for suspending its uranium enrichment and the International Atomic Energy Agency declaring its nuclear programme to be making dramatic progress, the image projected abroad is one of powerful menace by a populist self-confident government. That view has been enhanced by US claims of an Iranian summer surge designed to force American troops out of Iraq.

A journalist covering Iran should know that Iran is well within its rights to enrich Uranium under the NPT. The UN resolution he refers to was obtained under pressure from the US, and it deals with the inspections agreed to voluntarily by Iran, not with its NPT obligations. The IAEA, on the other hand has been turning over information gathered during the inspections to US and Israel. Both the countries have prepared the detailed target lists for their planned bombing of Iran through the information provided by IAEA inspectors. There is no reason, therefore, that Iran should cooperate with an organization, whose sole purpose is to legitimize US-Israeli aggression against other sovereign states — especially, when it has shown no interest whatever in preventing, or for that matter containing, the vast Israeli nuclear program.

Tait ends by saying,

If the west really is headed towards a full-frontal confrontation with Iran, it will find itself up against a country not at ease, but at loggerheads, with itself.

Why a liberal paper like The Guardian is printing this rubbish I don’t know but I am getting fed up of being patronised by the likes Robert Tait and Simon Tisdall using their position on to indoctrinate the supposedly ignorant masses. The only thing they’ve not done so far is promise us that it will be a cakewalk and that we will be greeted with sweets and flowers.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

A Coordinated Campaign Of Propaganda

The Blotter (the ABC news blog) has just published an article that the Commander Guy has allegedly authorised covert action against Iran:

The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert “black” operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.
The sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the subject, say President Bush has signed a “nonlethal presidential finding” that puts into motion a CIA plan that reportedly includes a coordinated campaign of propaganda, disinformation and manipulation of Iran’s currency and international financial transactions

Well, that probably explains yesterday’s story in the Guardian.

But wait, there’s more! The Blotter’s story itself may be part of this campaign of disinformation.

Remarkably quickly, rightwing pundits have marched in lockstep with a single message about this revelation: blame the leak on the liberals and add that the leak makes an attack on Iran the only option left.

The White House intended on using this plan to keep from having to use a military option to stop the mullahs from getting their hands on a nuclear weapon. In fact, ABC reports that Dick Cheney preferred the military option, but that Bush overruled him in favor of the covert action instead. As I have written repeatedly here, a military strike is a lousy choice given the terrain, battleground, and options for targets in Iran as well as the political situation on the ground.

Thanks to the loose lips at Langley and ABC, that option may have to go back to the top of the list. Covert actions that appear on national television tend to lose the element of surprise, after all, and the Iranians can now take steps to block these actions… Someone in the CIA or in the larger “intelligence community” can’t keep their mouths shut. Thanks to them, we may wind up with no other option against Iranian nuclear ambitions except the military strike.

and Wizbang’s Kim Priestly adds:

Prediction: at some point, the nutroots will accuse Cheney of ordering a member of his staff to leak the President’s secret covert action to ABC in order to force the military strikes that Bush overruled.

Given the speed with which the extreme Right has established message discipline and given the admission that the Bush administration was already conducting propaganda operations against Iran, I think that’s a perfectly reasonable accusation to make. Interesting that Kim thought of it first. But we may never know what the truth is.

UPDATE: In response to these allegations from the wingnutocracy, The Blotter published the following:

In a statement ABC News said, “In the six days since we first contacted the CIA and the White House, at no time did they indicate that broadcasting this report would jeopardize lives or operations on the ground. ABC News management gave them the repeated opportunity to make whatever objection they wanted to regarding our report. They chose not to.”

ABC News said, “This piece was very carefully reported, and it puts solid facts on the table concerning a crucial foreign policy challenge facing the United States and the world.”

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,




Bad Behavior has blocked 170 access attempts in the last 7 days.